2026 Quebec General Election
92.1% seats called 6 total seat gap Web model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PQ | 62 | 60 | +2 |
| PLQ | 37 | 39 | −2 |
| PCQ | 18 | 19 | −1 |
| QS | 10 | 9 | +1 |
| CAQ | 0 | 0 | exact |
Track record
The tracked Canadian projection archive, shown beside the final result. Hits and misses use the same measurements and appear with the same prominence.
Updated October 2026
89.9%
Mean constituency-winner accuracy across tracked Canadian elections
7
Elections tracked
98.0%
Best result: 2024 Nova Scotia General Election
2025 Canadian federal election
On the 2025 Canadian federal election, Poliwave produced the most accurate absolute seat-count projection among Canadian electoral forecasters: the smallest aggregate gap between projected and actual seats across the top four parties.
On constituency-level accuracy (the share of seats whose winner the model correctly identified), Poliwave landed within one percentage point of the long-established national benchmark, despite being substantially newer and built by a small independent group rather than an institutional team. The full election-by-election breakdown is below.
That projection was produced with the Excel model that preceded this website.
92.1% seats called 6 total seat gap Web model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PQ | 62 | 60 | +2 |
| PLQ | 37 | 39 | −2 |
| PCQ | 18 | 19 | −1 |
| QS | 10 | 9 | +1 |
| CAQ | 0 | 0 | exact |
86.0% seats called 18 total seat gap Excel model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LPC | 167 | 169 | −2 |
| CPC | 137 | 144 | −7 |
| BQ | 24 | 22 | +2 |
| NDP | 13 | 7 | +6 |
| GRN | 2 | 1 | +1 |
85.0% seats called 24 total seat gap Excel model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC | 87 | 80 | +7 |
| NDP | 15 | 27 | −12 |
| LIB | 19 | 14 | +5 |
| GRN | 2 | 2 | exact |
| OTH | 1 | 1 | exact |
98.0% seats called 2 total seat gap Excel model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC | 44 | 43 | +1 |
| NDP | 8 | 9 | −1 |
| LIB | 2 | 2 | exact |
| OTH | 1 | 1 | exact |
92.0% seats called 10 total seat gap Excel model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKP | 29 | 34 | −5 |
| NDP | 32 | 27 | +5 |
90.0% seats called 10 total seat gap Excel model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIB | 26 | 31 | −5 |
| PC | 21 | 16 | +5 |
| GRN | 2 | 2 | exact |
86.0% seats called 4 total seat gap Excel model
| Party | Projected | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDP | 45 | 47 | −2 |
| CON | 46 | 44 | +2 |
| GRN | 2 | 2 | exact |
Accuracy is the share of seats whose winner the model identified correctly. The total seat gap is the sum of the absolute differences between projected and actual seats across every party listed, which is the figure the headline claim above refers to. Poliwave scores seat projections rather than vote-share predictions. How the projections are produced is documented on the methodology page.